CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE

300 FOREST AVENUE

PACIFIC GROVE, CALIFORNIA 93950

TELEPHONE (831) 648-3190 • FAX (831) 648-3184

 

NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING

 

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD

 

DATE & TIME:        TUESDAY, May 13, 2008 – 6:00 P.M.

LOCATION:    CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS – 300 FOREST AVENUE

 

NOTE: The Architectural Review Board (ARB) may move and reorder the items on the consent and regular agendas. The public is encouraged to be present at the start of the meeting to hear and comment on items of interest.

 

The Architectural Review Board will not begin consideration of any item on the agenda later than 9 p.m. unless, by majority vote, the ARB decides to consider an item or items after 9 p.m. Any items on this agenda not considered this evening will be continued to a future meeting.

 

The general findings and conditions of approval for architectural approval applications are noted on the last page of this agenda. These apply to all final approvals of architectural applications. Special and additional findings and conditions may be added to an architectural approval as deemed necessary by the ARB. 

 

All projects are subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and disclosure. CEQA status is noted on the agenda for each project.

 

Structures listed on the City’s Historic Resources Inventory (HRI) are denoted on the agenda with an “(HRI)” next to their project address.

                                                                                               

Architectural Review Board (ARB) Members:

 

            Jeff Becom

            Darlene Billstrom

            Ken Hinshaw

            Doug Howe, Chair

            Maryanne Larson Spradling, Vice Chair

            Wilda Northrop          

           

Members of the audience may come forward to observe the presentation of agenda items.  Comments may be made after the applicant has made his/her presentation.

 

1.            CALL TO ORDER

 

2.            ROLL CALL

 

3.            APPROVAL OF MINUTES

 

v  Minutes from the April 22, 2008, ARB Site Review and Regular Hearing.

 

4.            COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC

 

(Comments from the audience may concern matters not on the agenda, but must deal with matters subject to the jurisdiction of the Board.  Comments will not receive Board action.)

 

5.            COMMUNICATIONS

 

6.            WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE

 

7.            CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS

 

8.            PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS

 

9.            SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS

 

10.        ITEMS WITHDRAWN OR TABLED

 

11.        REQUESTS FOR CONTINUANCE

 

12.        CONSENT AGENDA

 

13.        REGULAR AGENDA

 

a.                  Project Address:  1249 Buena Vista Lane

 

Architectural Approval Application No. 3769-08 for proposed remodel of a single-family dwelling with new entry/stair addition and deck.

Applicant:  Jeffrey Kilpatrick, architect, for Robert Lis

Continued from the 04/22/08 ARB hearing.

CEQA Status:  Class 1 Categorical Exemption

Staff reference:  Senior Planner, Patrick Kelly

Recommended action:  Discuss and take appropriate action.

 

b.                  Project Address:  1240 Surf Avenue

 

Architectural Approval Application No. 3754-08 for proposed exterior additions to an existing single-family dwelling, and adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration.

Applicant:  Ash R. Shoukry

CEQA Status:  Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared

Staff reference:  Senior Planner, Sarah Hardgrave

Recommended action: Discuss and take appropriate action.

 

c.                   Project Address:  945 Cedar Avenue

 

Architectural Approval Application No. 3490-05 for proposed new single-family dwelling. 

Applicant:  Cynthia Spellacy for Elva Perkins

Continued from the 04/22/08 ARB hearing.

CEQA Status:  Class 3 Categorical Exemption

Staff reference:  Senior Planner, Sarah Hardgrave

Recommended action: Discuss and take appropriate action.

 

d.                  Project Address:  226 Willow Street (HRI)

           

            Architectural Approval Application No. 3773-08 for proposed exterior alterations to an existing single-family dwelling listed on the City’s Historic Resources Inventory.  

            Applicant:  Bruce Looram

            Continued from the 04/08/08 and 04/22/08 ARB hearings.

            CEQA Status:  Class 31 Categorical Exemption

            Staff reference: Associate Planner, Tricia Wotan

Recommended action: Discuss and take appropriate action.

 

e.                   Project Address:  874 Gibson Avenue

 

Architectural Approval Application No. 3736-07 for proposed addition of a second story and expansion of the first story to a single-family residence, and the addition of a detached, one-car garage with workshop and storage space. Applicant:  Joseph Rock, Architect, for the Higbie family

Continued from the 04/08/08 and 04/22/08 ARB hearing.

CEQA Status:  Class 1 Categorical Exemption

Staff reference:  Associate Planner, Tricia Wotan

Recommended action: Discuss and take appropriate action.

 

f.                   Project Address:  1169 Presidio Boulevard

 

Architectural Approval Application No. 3722-07 for proposed remodel and addition to an existing one-story, single-family dwelling, and Tree Permit No. 58253 for the removal of four (4) trees on-site.

Applicant: Ted Larson, Architect, for Dave Gross

Continued from the 02/26/08, 03/11/08, 03/25/08, and 04/08/08 ARB hearings.

CEQA Status:  Class 1 Categorical Exemption

Staff reference: Associate Planner, Tricia Wotan

Recommended action: Discuss and take appropriate action.

 

14.        Discussion regarding changes to the Brown AcT

 

Board to receive memo from David Laredo, City Attorney, regarding changes to the State of California Brown Act. Government Code Section 54957.5 has been amended by Senate Bill 343 of 2008.  This law clarifies and expands the Brown Act requirement for public distribution of materials provided to any legislative body after the initial agenda packet is delivered.

Reference:  Chief Planner, Lynn Burgess, AICP

 

15.        Reports of Boardmembers

 

Boardmembers may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement or make a brief report on his or her activities. In addition, the Boardmembers may provide a referral to staff or other resources for factual information, request staff to report back to the body at a subsequent meeting concerning a City matter or direct staff to place a request to agendize a matter of business on a future agenda (G.C. 54954.2).

 

16.        REPORTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

Reference:  Chief Planner, Lynn Burgess, AICP

 

17.        ADJOURNMENT

 

Note:  Materials for this agenda, and copies of previous meeting agendas and minutes for the Architectural Review Board, are available for review at the Community Development Department, 300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove.

 

THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES. THE CITY MANAGER’S CONFERENCE ROOM AND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS IN PACIFIC GROVE CITY HALL ARE ACCESSIBLE MEETING PLACES.  A LIMITED NUMBER OF DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE TO ASSIST THOSE WHO ARE HEARING IMPAIRED.  IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO USE ONE OF THESE DEVICES, PLEASE CONTACT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SECRETARY AT (831) 648-3190.

 

NOTICE TO APPLICANTS

 

Applicants or their representatives must be present at the meeting for which their item, including those items on the Consent Agenda, is scheduled.  If unable to attend, the applicant must submit a written request for continuance prior to the meeting.  The item may be denied if continuance is not requested. 

 

Decisions rendered by the Architectural Review Board may be appealed to the Planning Commission using a form available at the Community Development Department.  The appeal form, plus an appeal fee, must be filed with the Community Development Department within 10 days (5 days in the case of a single-family dwelling in an R-1 zone as considered under the terms of subsection F. of Section 23.73.040 of the Municipal Code) of the action or decision being appealed. Notwithstanding the time limit for appeal set out in the above section, the Planning Commission and the City Council shall always have until their next regularly scheduled meeting following Architectural Review Board action to decide to review such action. No building permit pertaining to an Architectural Review Board action may be issued until the appeal period has passed. 

 

Applicants are requested to contact the Building Department for building permit requirements. No sign approved by the Architectural Review Board shall be painted, erected, or otherwise installed until the appeal period has passed.  Any proposed exterior changes from approved plans require Architectural Review Board review and approval.  There is a fee for design changes submitted after the architectural approval application has been granted final approval.

 

STANDARD FINDING FOR APPROVAL OF AN ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL APPLICATION

 

The architecture and general appearance of the building(s) will be in keeping with the neighborhood and the completed project will not be detrimental to the orderly and harmonious development of the City nor impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood.

 

STANDARD CONDITIONS OF ARCHITECTURAL APPLICATION APPROVALS

 

1.      This approval shall be null and void if a building permit has not been applied for within one year from the date of approval. Application for extension of this approval must be made prior to the expiration date.

2.      All construction must occur in strict compliance with the proposal as set forth in the application(s) for permits, subject to any special conditions. Any deviation from the approved plans must be reviewed and approved by the staff and may require Architectural Review Board approval.

3.      The terms and conditions shall be perpetual, and it is the intention of the Architectural Review Board and the permittee to bind all future owners and possessors of the subject property to the terms and conditions.

4.      Review by the Public Works Department is required prior to issuance of the building permit. The applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit from the Public Works Department before undertaking any work in the Public way and prior to issuance of the building permit.

 

JUDICIAL TIME LIMITS

 

This serves as written notice that Pacific Grove Municipal Code Section 1.20.010 incorporates Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California and provides a ninety-day limitation for judicial review of any final administrative decision by the council, or any board, commissioner, or officer of the city.