
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
TELEPHONE (831) 648-3190 • FAX (831)
648-3184
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING
ARCHITECTURAL
REVIEW BOARD
DATE & TIME: TUESDAY, JANUARY 13, 2009 – 6:00 P.M.
LOCATION: CITY
HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS –
NOTE: The Architectural Review Board (ARB) may move and reorder the items on the consent and regular agendas. The public is encouraged to be present at the start of the meeting to hear and comment on items of interest.
The Architectural Review Board will not begin consideration of any item on the agenda later than 9 p.m. unless, by majority vote, the ARB decides to consider an item or items after 9 p.m. Any items on this agenda not considered this evening will be continued to a future meeting.
The general findings and conditions of approval for architectural approval applications are noted on the last page of this agenda. These apply to all final approvals of architectural applications. Special and additional findings and conditions may be added to an architectural approval as deemed necessary by the ARB.
All projects are subject to the
Structures listed on the City’s Historic Resources Inventory (HRI) are denoted on the agenda with an “(HRI)” next to their project address.
Architectural Review Board (ARB) Members:
Jeff Becom
Darlene
Billstrom
Jeff
Edmonds
Ken
Hinshaw
Doug Howe,
Chair
Maryanne Larson
Spradling, Vice Chair
Wilda
Northrop
Members of the audience may come forward to review and observe
exhibits being presented for any agenda item.
Public comment on a specific agenda item may be made after the applicant
has presented his/her project to the Board.
2.
ROLL CALL
Review and
take action on the minutes from the December 23, 2008, Regular ARB Site Review
and Regular Meeting.
4.
COMMENTS FROM
THE PUBLIC
(Comments from the audience may concern matters not on the
agenda, but must deal with matters subject to the jurisdiction of the
Board. Comments will not receive Board
action.)
5.
COMMUNICATIONS
6.
WRITTEN
CORRESPONDENCE
7.
CITY COUNCIL
ACTIONS
12.
REQUESTS FOR
CONTINUANCE
13.
CONSENT AGENDA
a.
Project Address:
Applicant: Jeanne Byrne, Architect, on behalf of Roy Ridgway
Final Review of landscaping, exterior lighting and colors
as required per ARB final approval of Architectural Approval No. 3524-05 on
February 14, 2006
CEQA
status: Class 3 Categorical Exemption
Staff
reference: Senior Planner, Sarah
Hardgrave
Recommended
action: Discuss and take appropriate action.
a.
Project Address:
Architectural
Approval Application No. 3844-08 to allow a design change for a proposed
addition to the rear of a single-family dwelling that is listed on the City’s Historic
Resources Inventory. Project received
previous Architectural Approval for a rear addition (AA 3560-06) on April 16,
2006, and received approval for Historic Preservation Permit No. 08-0237
allowing a reduced rear yard setback of 8 feet on November 13, 2008.
Applicant: Jesse Williams and Peter Moppert, for Laidlaw
Williams
CEQA
status: Class 31 Categorical Exemption
Staff
reference: Senior Planner,
Recommended
action: Discuss and take appropriate action.
b.
Project Address:
Historic
Relocation Permit Application No. 08-62, Architectural Approval Application No.
3745-08 and Tree Permit No. 08-0470 to allow the on-site relocation of a
single-family dwelling, a new 2-story addition to the existing dwelling, and
the pruning of existing oak trees on-site.
The existing structure is listed on the City’s Historic Resources
Inventory. The existing historic
structure is proposed to be moved approximately 20 feet forward on the site,
necessitating the pruning of the existing oak trees. Per Code Section 23.76.100, a structure
proposed for relocation may be permitted following the same procedural
guidelines described in Section 23.76.090, Demolitions, and the filing of an
application for relocation. The Historic
Resources Committee has reviewed the application, as per Code Section
23.76.090(b)(2), and has forwarded the application to the Architectural Review
Board for action.
Applicant: Ed Bredthauer, on behalf of Charlie and Nancy
Alvarez
CEQA
status: Class 31 Categorical Exemption
Staff
reference: Senior Planner,
Recommended
action: Discuss and take appropriate action.
c.
Project Address: 306 7th Street (HRI)
Historic Preservation Permit Application No. 08-0239 and Architectural
Approval Application No. 3833-08 to allow renovations, a 118 square foot addition,
and new front entry ramp and landing to an existing single-family
dwelling. The existing structure is
listed on the City’s Historic Resources Inventory and has non-conforming
setbacks.
Applicant: Hunter Eldridge, on behalf of Max and Jean
Bell
CEQA
Status: Class 31 Categorical Exemption
Staff
reference: Senior Planner,
Recommended
action: Discuss and take appropriate action.
d.
Project Address: 1040 Benito Avenue
Architectural
Approval Application No. 3834-08 and Tree Permit Application No. 2008367 for a
proposed new 2-story single-family dwelling and removal of 3 trees on a vacant
lot.
Applicant: Roy Larson, owner
CEQA
status: Class 3 Categorical Exemption
Staff
reference: Senior Planner,
Recommended
action: Discuss and take appropriate action.
e.
Project Address: 512 8th Street
Architectural
Approval Application No. 3845-08 for a proposed new 2-story single-family
dwelling on a vacant lot.
Applicant:
CEQA
status: Class 3 Categorical Exemption
Staff
reference: Senior Planner,
Recommended
action: Discuss and take appropriate action.
f.
Project Address: 1169 Presidio Boulevard
Architectural
Approval Application No. 3797-08 for review of carport details for a project
approved by the ARB on October 28, 2008.
This item was continued from December 9, 2008 to allow the applicant
time to revise the carport plans.
Applicant: Ted Larson, on behalf of Dave Gross
CEQA
status: Class 1 Categorical Exemption
Staff
reference: Senior Planner,
Recommended
action: Discuss and take appropriate action.
15.
Reports of Boardmembers
Boardmembers may
ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement or make a brief
report on his or her activities. In addition, the Board members may provide a
referral to staff or other resources for factual information, request staff to
report back to the body at a subsequent meeting concerning a City matter or
direct staff to place a request to agendize a matter of business on a future
agenda (G.C. 54954.2).
16.
REPORTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Reference: Senior Planner, Lynn Burgess
17.
ADJOURNMENT
Note: Materials for this agenda, and
copies of previous meeting agendas and minutes for the Architectural Review
Board, are available for review at the Community Development Department,
THE CITY OF
NOTICE
TO APPLICANTS
Applicants or their
representatives must be present at the meeting for which their item, including those items on the Consent Agenda,
is scheduled. If unable to attend, the applicant must submit a written request for
continuance prior to the meeting. The
item may be denied if continuance is not requested.
Decisions rendered by
the Architectural Review Board may be appealed to the Planning Commission using
a form available at the Community Development Department. The appeal form, plus an appeal fee, must be
filed with the Community Development Department within 10 days (5 days in the
case of a single-family dwelling in an R-1 zone as considered under the terms
of subsection F. of Section 23.73.040 of the Municipal Code) of the action or
decision being appealed. Notwithstanding the time limit for appeal set out in
the above section, the Planning Commission and the City Council shall always
have until their next regularly scheduled meeting following Architectural
Review Board action to decide to review such action. No building permit
pertaining to an Architectural Review Board action may be issued until the
appeal period has passed.
Applicants are
requested to contact the Building Department for building permit requirements.
No sign approved by the Architectural Review Board shall be painted, erected,
or otherwise installed until the appeal period has passed. Any
proposed exterior changes from approved plans require Architectural Review
Board review and approval. There is
a fee for design changes submitted after the architectural approval application
has been granted final approval.
STANDARD FINDING FOR APPROVAL OF AN
ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL APPLICATION
The architecture and
general appearance of the building(s) will be in keeping with the neighborhood and
the completed project will not be detrimental to the orderly and harmonious
development of the City nor impair the desirability of investment or occupation
in the neighborhood.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF ARCHITECTURAL APPLICATION APPROVALS
1. This approval shall be null and void if a building permit has not been applied for within one year from the date of approval. Application for extension of this approval must be made prior to the expiration date.
2. All construction must occur in strict compliance with the proposal as set forth in the application(s) for permits, subject to any special conditions. Any deviation from the approved plans must be reviewed and approved by the staff and may require Architectural Review Board approval.
3. The terms and conditions shall be perpetual, and it is the intention of the Architectural Review Board and the permittee to bind all future owners and possessors of the subject property to the terms and conditions.
4. Review
by the Public Works Department is required prior to issuance of the building
permit. The applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit from the Public Works
Department before undertaking any work in the Public way and prior to issuance
of the building permit.
STANDARD
FINDING FOR APPROVAL OF A SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION
The proposed sign effectively conveys the business
type and identity to the public and possesses pleasing elements of design that
protects and enhances the architectural character and harmony of the community,
buildings, and neighborhood in which it is located.
JUDICIAL
TIME LIMITS
This serves as written notice that Pacific Grove Municipal Code Section
1.20.010 incorporates Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the
State of