
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
TELEPHONE (831) 648-3190 • FAX (831)
648-3184
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING
ARCHITECTURAL
REVIEW BOARD
DATE & TIME: TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2009 – 6:00 P.M.
LOCATION: CITY
HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS –
NOTE: The Architectural Review Board (ARB) may move and reorder the items on the consent and regular agendas. The public is encouraged to be present at the start of the meeting to hear and comment on items of interest.
The Architectural Review Board will not begin consideration of any item on the agenda later than 9 p.m. unless, by majority vote, the ARB decides to consider an item or items after 9 p.m. Any items on this agenda not considered this evening will be continued to a future meeting.
The general findings and conditions of approval for architectural approval applications are noted on the last page of this agenda. These apply to all final approvals of architectural applications. Special and additional findings and conditions may be added to an architectural approval as deemed necessary by the ARB.
All projects are subject to the
Structures listed on the City’s Historic Resources Inventory (HRI) are denoted on the agenda with an “(HRI)” next to their project address.
Architectural Review Board (ARB) Members:
Robin
Aeschliman
Jeff Becom
Jeff
Edmonds, Vice-Chair
Ken
Hinshaw
Doug Howe,
Chair
Wilda
Northrop
Members of the audience may come forward to review and observe
exhibits being presented for any agenda item.
Public comment on a specific agenda item may be made after the applicant
has presented his/her project to the Board.
2.
ROLL CALL
Review and
take action on the minutes from the November 10, 2009, Regular ARB Site Review and Regular Meeting.
4.
COMMENTS FROM
THE PUBLIC
(Comments from the audience may concern matters not on the
agenda, but must deal with matters subject to the jurisdiction of the
Board. Comments will not receive Board
action.)
5.
COMMUNICATIONS
6.
WRITTEN
CORRESPONDENCE
7.
CITY COUNCIL
ACTIONS
12.
REQUESTS FOR
CONTINUANCE
a.
Project Address:
Architectural Approval Application No. 3857-09 for final approval of
materials for renovations to a single family residence listed on the Historic
Resources Inventory.
CEQA status: Class 31 Categorical Exemption
Recommended
Architectural Review Guidelines: 33, 35, 36, and 37.
Staff
reference: Associate Planner, Valerie
Tallerico
Recommended
action: Continue to the December 8, 2009
ARB meeting
b.
Project Address:
Architectural Approval Application No. 3912-09 to allow a remodel and
addition to an existing single family dwelling and the addition of a second
floor deck and exterior stairs on the rear of the residence.
CEQA status: Class 1 Categorical Exemption
Recommended
Architectural Review Guidelines:7, 28, and 36
Staff
reference: Associate Planner, Valerie
Tallerico
Recommended
action: Continue to the December 8, 2009
ARB meeting
c.
Project Address:
Architectural
Approval Application No. 3846-08 and Tree Permit Application 090090 for
proposed demolition of an existing single family residence and construction of
a new two-story single family residence and removal of two trees.
Applicant:
Steve Mickel
CEQA
status: Class 3 Categorical Exemption
Recommended
Architectural Review Guidelines: 1, 2, 6, 14, 21, 22, 23, 24, 34, 36, 37 and
38.
Staff
reference: Associate Planner, Valerie
Tallerico
Recommended
action: Continue the project to a future
ARB meeting.
13.
CONSENT AGENDA
a.
Project Address: 1111 Surf Avenue
Architectural Approval Application No. 3874-09 (Final) for the proposed demolition
of the existing single story residence except for floor framing and foundation
and new construction of a single family residence using the existing floor
framing and foundation with first and second floor additions
totaling an additional 1,050 square feet to the residence. The proposed project
includes a total floor area of 2,598 sq. ft.
CEQA status: Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared
Recommended
Architectural Review Guidelines: 1, 2, 5, 6, 9, 14, 16, 24, 27, 28, 29, 33, 34,
and 36.
Staff
reference: Associate Planner, Valerie
Tallerico
Recommended
action: Discuss, adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration and take appropriate
action on Architectural Approval.
b.
Project Address: 186 Cedar Street
Applicant: Rick Steres, Architect on behalf of Linnet Harlan and Duane Edgington
CEQA
Status: Categorically Exempt, Class 1
Recommended
Architectural Review Guidelines: 24, 27, 28, 31, 32, 34, 38 and 39.
Staff
reference: Senior Planner,
Recommended
action: Discuss and take appropriate action.
c.
Project Address: 1110 Austin Avenue
Architectural Approval Application No. 3877-09 (Final) for a proposed
two-story single family residence on a vacant lot.
CEQA status: Class 3 Categorical Exemption
Recommended
Architectural Review Guidelines: 1, 2, 7, 9, 13, 21, 22, 23, 24, 29, 32, 35,
and 36.
Staff
reference: Associate Planner, Valerie
Tallerico
Recommended
action: Discuss and take appropriate action.
d.
Project Address: 460 Beaumont Avenue
Applicant: Jim Muncie, on behalf of Betty Shammas
CEQA
Status: Categorically Exempt, Class 1
Recommended
Architectural Review Guidelines: 37 and 38.
Staff
reference: Senior Planner,
Recommended
action: Discuss and take appropriate action.
15.
Reports of Boardmembers
Boardmembers may
ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement or make a brief
report on his or her activities. In addition, the Board members may provide a
referral to staff or other resources for factual information, request staff to
report back to the body at a subsequent meeting concerning a City matter or
direct staff to place a request to agendize a matter of business on a future
agenda (G.C. 54954.2).
16.
REPORTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Reference: Chief Planner, Lynn Burgess
17.
ADJOURNMENT
Note: Materials for this agenda, and
copies of previous meeting agendas and minutes for the Architectural Review
Board, are available for review at the Community Development Department,
THE CITY OF
NOTICE
TO APPLICANTS
Applicants or their
representatives must be present at the meeting for which their item, including those items on the Consent Agenda,
is scheduled. If unable to attend, the applicant must submit a written request for
continuance prior to the meeting. The
item may be denied if continuance is not requested.
Decisions rendered by
the Architectural Review Board may be appealed to the Planning Commission using
a form available at the Community Development Department. The appeal form, plus an appeal fee, must be
filed with the Community Development Department within 10 days (5 days in the
case of a single-family dwelling not listed on the historic resources inventory
as considered under the terms of subsection A. of Section 23.73.080 of the
Municipal Code) of the action or decision being appealed. Notwithstanding the
time limit for appeal set out in the above section, the Planning Commission and
the City Council shall always have until their next regularly scheduled meeting
following Architectural Review Board action to decide to review such action. No
building permit pertaining to an Architectural Review Board action may be
issued until the appeal period has passed.
Applicants are
requested to contact the Building Department for building permit requirements.
No sign approved by the Architectural Review Board shall be painted, erected,
or otherwise installed until the appeal period has passed. Any
proposed exterior changes from approved plans require Architectural Review
Board review and approval. There is
a fee for design changes submitted after the architectural approval application
has been granted final approval.
Applicants with approved projects that have
been deemed statutorily or categorically exempt under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) may file a Notice of Exemption (NOE) directly
with the Monterey County Clerk in order to reduce the CEQA challenge period
from 180 days to 35 days (CEQA Guidelines Section 15062). Applicants wishing to file the NOE should
contact their planner for instructions on how to file the notice with
Filing of a NOE by the City of
STANDARD FINDING FOR APPROVAL OF AN
ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL APPLICATION
The architecture and
general appearance of the building(s) will be in keeping with the neighborhood
and the completed project will not be detrimental to the orderly and harmonious
development of the City nor impair the desirability of investment or occupation
in the neighborhood.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF ARCHITECTURAL APPLICATION APPROVALS
1. This approval shall be null and void if a building permit has not been applied for within one year from the date of approval. Application for extension of this approval must be made prior to the expiration date.
2. All construction must occur in strict compliance with the proposal as set forth in the application(s) for permits, subject to any special conditions. Any deviation from the approved plans must be reviewed and approved by the staff and may require Architectural Review Board approval.
3. The terms and conditions shall be perpetual, and it is the intention of the Architectural Review Board and the permittee to bind all future owners and possessors of the subject property to the terms and conditions.
4. Review
by the Public Works Department is required prior to issuance of the building
permit. The applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit from the Public Works
Department before undertaking any work in the Public way and prior to issuance
of the building permit.
STANDARD
FINDING FOR APPROVAL OF A SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION
The proposed sign effectively conveys the business
type and identity to the public and possesses pleasing elements of design that
protects and enhances the architectural character and harmony of the community,
buildings, and neighborhood in which it is located.
JUDICIAL
TIME LIMITS
This serves as written notice that Pacific Grove Municipal Code Section
1.20.010 incorporates Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the
State of